Detection of microcalcifications by characteristic magnetic susceptibility effects using MR phase image cross‐correlation analysis
- 27 February 2015
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Physics
- Vol. 42 (3), 1436-1452
- https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4908009
Abstract
To develop and evaluate a new method for detecting calcium deposits using their characteristic magnetic susceptibility effects on magnetic resonance (MR) images at high fields and demonstrate its potential in practice for detecting breast microcalcifications. Characteristic dipole signatures of calcium deposits were detected in magnetic resonance phase images by computing the cross-correlation between the acquired data and a library of templates containing simulated phase patterns of spherical deposits. The influence of signal-to-noise ratio and various other MR parameters on the results were assessed using simulations and validated experimentally. The method was tested experimentally for detection of calcium fragments within gel phantoms and calcium-like inhomogeneities within chicken tissue at 7 T with optimized MR acquisition parameters. The method was also evaluated for detection of simulated microcalcifications, modeled from biopsy samples of malignant breast cancer, inserted in silico into breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) of healthy subjects at 7 T. For both assessments of calcium fragments in phantoms and biopsy-based simulated microcalcifications in breast MRIs, receiver operator characteristic curve analyses were performed to determine the cross-correlation index cutoff, for achieving optimal sensitivity and specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC), for measuring the method's performance. The method detected calcium fragments with sizes of 0.14-0.79 mm, 1 mm calcium-like deposits, and simulated microcalcifications with sizes of 0.4-1.0 mm in images with voxel sizes between (0.2 mm)(3) and (0.6 mm)(3). In images acquired at 7 T with voxel sizes of (0.2 mm)(3)-(0.4 mm)(3), calcium fragments (size 0.3-0.4 mm) were detected with a sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 78%-90%, 51%-68%, and 0.77%-0.88%, respectively. In images acquired with a human 7 T scanner, acquisition times below 12 min, and voxel sizes of (0.4 mm)(3)-(0.6 mm)(3), simulated microcalcifications with sizes of 0.6-1.0 mm were detected with a sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 75%-87%, 54%-87%, and 0.76%-0.90%, respectively. However, different microcalcification shapes were indistinguishable. The new method is promising for detecting relatively large microcalcifications (i.e., 0.6-0.9 mm) within the breast at 7 T in reasonable times. Detection of smaller deposits at high field may be possible with higher spatial resolution, but such images require relatively long scan times. Although mammography can detect and distinguish the shape of smaller microcalcifications with superior sensitivity and specificity, this alternative method does not expose tissue to ionizing radiation, is not affected by breast density, and can be combined with other MRI methods (e.g., dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion weighted MRI), to potentially improve diagnostic performance.Funding Information
- NIH/NCI (5U01CA142565-04)
- NIH/NCI (P30 CA68485)
- National Institutes of Health (5U01CA142565-04)
- National Cancer Institute (P30 CA68485)
- National Institutes of Health (5U01CA142565-04)
- National Cancer Institute (P30 CA68485)
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Feasibility of 7 Tesla Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Determination of Intrinsic Sensitivity and High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging, and 1H-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant TherapyInvestigative Radiology, 2011
- 31P MRSI and 1H MRS at 7 T: initial results in human breast cancerNMR in Biomedicine, 2011
- Identification of calcification with MRI using susceptibility‐weighted imaging: A case studyJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2008
- Sensitive and automated detection of iron-oxide-labeled cells using phase image cross-correlation analysisMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 2008
- Stratification of Breast Cancer Risk in Women With Atypia: A Mayo Cohort StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI in Patients with Suspicious Microcalcifications on Mammography: Results of a Multicenter TrialAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2006
- A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibilityConcepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B, 2003
- Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: A meta-analysisAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1998
- Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretationJAMA, 1996