Bridging the qualitative–quantitative divide: Experiences from conducting a mixed methods evaluation in the RUCAS programme
- 1 February 2016
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Evaluation and Program Planning
- Vol. 54, 144-151
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.07.008
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- European Commission (TEMPUS – No. 511118-2010-GR-JPCR)
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exploring the Pedagogical Meaning and Implications of the 4Cs “Super Skills” for the 21st Century through Bruner’s 5E Lenses of Knowledge Construction to Improve Pedagogies of the New Learning ParadigmCreative Education, 2015
- Sustainability process assessment on transformative potentials: the Graz Model for Integrative DevelopmentJournal of Cleaner Production, 2013
- Developing and Validating an ESD Student Competence Framework : A Tempus - Rucas InitiativeInternational Journal of Excellence in Education, 2013
- Board Editorial: Quantitative vs qualitative research: A false dichotomyJournal of Research in Nursing, 2012
- The Politics, Fashions, and Conventions of Research MethodsJournal of Mixed Methods Research, 2011
- More Than Method?: A Discussion of Paradigm Differences Within Mixed Methods ResearchJournal of Mixed Methods Research, 2011
- Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism RegainedJournal of Mixed Methods Research, 2007
- Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has ComeEducational Researcher, 2004