Differences in treatment choices for localised prostate cancer diagnosed in private and public health services
Open Access
- 1 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by AMPCo in The Medical Journal of Australia
- Vol. 213 (9), 411-+
- https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50794
Abstract
Objective: To compare treatments for localised prostate cancer for men diagnosed in private and public health services in Victoria. Design: Retrospective analysis of Victorian Cancer Registry data linked to population-based administrative health datasets. Setting, participants: 29 325 Victorian men diagnosed with prostate cancer during 2011-2017. Main outcome measures: Proportions of men in private and public health services receiving radical prostatectomy (with or without curative radiation therapy) or curative external beam radiation therapy alone within 12 months of diagnosis. Results: After adjusting for age, tumour classification and comorbidity, men diagnosed in private health services received radical treatment more frequently than men diagnosed in public health services (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.49). The proportion of private patients who underwent radical prostatectomy was larger than that for public patients (44% v 28%; OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 2.13-2.44) and the proportion of private patients who received curative external beam radiation therapy alone (excluding brachytherapy) was smaller (9% v 19%; OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.42- 0.49). These differences were apparent for all International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) tumour grades. The magnitude of the difference for prostatectomy was greater for men aged 70 years or more; for radiation therapy alone, it was larger for those diagnosed before age 70. The differences between private and public services narrowed during 2011-2017 for men with ISUP grade 1 disease, but not ISUP grade 2- 5 tumours. Conclusion: Prostate cancer treatment choices differ substantially between men diagnosed in private and public health services in Victoria. These differences are not explained by disease severity or comorbidity.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patterns of care and outcomes for men diagnosed with prostate cancer in Victoria: an updateAnz Journal of Surgery, 2018
- Reducing overtreatment of prostate cancer by radical prostatectomy in Eastern Ontario: a population-based cohort studyCMAJ Open, 2018
- Follow-up of Prostatectomy versus Observation for Early Prostate CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2017
- Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason ScoreEuropean Urology, 2015
- Why do patients regret their prostate cancer treatment? A systematic review of regret after treatment for localized prostate cancerPsycho‐Oncology, 2015
- Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment of Prostate CancerEuropean Urology, 2014
- Patterns of care for men diagnosed with prostate cancer in Victoria from 2008 to 2011The Medical Journal of Australia, 2013
- Implementing a Class of Permutation Tests: ThecoinPackageJournal of Statistical Software, 2008