Patterns of care and outcomes for men diagnosed with prostate cancer in Victoria: an update
- 25 July 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anz Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 88 (10), 1037-1042
- https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.14722
Abstract
Background To update patterns of care for men diagnosed with prostate cancer in Victoria, Australia between 2008 and 2015. Methods From August 2008 to December 2015, 14 025 men diagnosed with prostate cancer were included. These data were obtained from the Prostate Cancer Outcome Registry – Victoria (PCOR‐Vic). Frequencies were used to describe hospital and patient characteristics and treatment types. Comparisons were made between previous period of analysis (2008–2011) to the most recent period (2011–2015). Survival analysis using a stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed. Results Mean age of diagnosis was 66.5 years and 44% of patients were diagnosed with Gleason 7 prostate cancer. Majority of notifications (63.6%) were received from a private institution and 70.2% of patients were diagnosed at a metropolitan institution. Most patients (95.3%) were diagnosed with clinically localized disease. Within 12 months of diagnosis, 55.9% of patients with low‐risk disease received no active treatment. Radical prostatectomy was the most common primary treatment with curative intent (47%). When comparing of patterns of care between 2008–2011 and 2011–2015, the proportion of patients diagnosed with Gleason 9–10 disease increased, as has the proportion of patients diagnosed with metastatic disease. Conclusion With the PCOR‐Vic, we were able to identify that increasing number of patients were diagnosed with high‐risk and metastatic disease. There has been an overall decrease in radical treatment rates, likely due to active surveillance playing a significant role especially in patients with low‐risk prostate cancer.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2014
- Positive surgical margins: rate, contributing factors and impact on further treatment: findings from the Prostate Cancer RegistryBJU International, 2014
- The Melbourne Consensus Statement on the early detection of prostate cancerBJU International, 2014
- The Prostate Cancer Registry: monitoring patterns and quality of care for men diagnosed with prostate cancerBJU International, 2012
- Radical Prostatectomy versus Observation for Localized Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Screening for Prostate Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation StatementAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2012
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative Outcomes and Complications After Robot-assisted Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2012
- Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Time Trends and Local Variation in Primary Treatment of Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Prostate cancer: socio‐economic, geographical and private‐health insurance effects on care and survivalBJU International, 2004