Antibiotic Treatment of Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Systematic Evaluation of the Available Evidence
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 February 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 58 (2), 654-663
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01222-13
Abstract
We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of the antibiotic treatment administered for infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Articles reporting the clinical outcomes of patients infected with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae according to the antibiotic treatment administered were eligible. Twenty nonrandomized studies comprising 692 patients who received definitive treatment were included. Almost all studies reported on Klebsiella spp. In 8 studies, the majority of infections were bacteremia, while pneumonia and urinary tract infections were the most common infections in 12 studies. In 10 studies, the majority of patients were critically ill. There are methodological issues, including clinical heterogeneity, that preclude the synthesis of the available evidence using statistical analyses, including meta-analysis. From the descriptive point of view, among patients who received combination treatment, mortality was up to 50% for the tigecycline-gentamicin combination, up to 64% for tigecycline-colistin, and up to 67% for carbapenem-colistin. Among the monotherapy-treated patients, mortality was up to 57% for colistin and up to 80% for tigecycline. Certain regimens were administered to a small number of patients in certain studies. Three studies reporting on 194 critically ill patients with bacteremia showed individually significantly lower mortality in the combination arm than in the monotherapy arm. In the other studies, no significant difference in mortality was recorded between the compared groups. Combination antibiotic treatment may be considered the optimal option for severely ill patients with severe infections. However, well-designed randomized studies of specific patient populations are needed to further clarify this issue.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Faculty Opinions recommendation of Vital signs: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.Published by H1 Connect ,2014
- Molecular surveillance and clinical outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae infectionsJournal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, 2014
- Bacteraemia due to OXA-48-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: a major clinical challengeClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2013
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, 2012Intensive Care Medicine, 2013
- High rate of colistin resistance among patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection accounts for an excess of mortalityClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2013
- Bloodstream infections caused by IMP-8-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates: the need for clinical laboratory detection of metallo-β-lactamases?European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2012
- Treatment of Klebsiella Pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC) infections: a review of published case series and case reportsAnnals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 2012
- Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Hospital-acquired, Ventilator-associated, and Healthcare-associated PneumoniaAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2005
- β lactam monotherapy versus β lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy for sepsis in immunocompetent patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trialsBMJ, 2004
- Once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides: review and recommendations for clinical practiceJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1997