Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management
Top Cited Papers
- 28 March 2008
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
- Vol. 21 (3), 337-361
- https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810863932
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the proposition that corporate social responsibility reporting could be viewed as both an outcome of, and part of reputation risk management processes.Design/methodology/approach: The paper draws heavily on management research. In addition, an image restoration framework is introduced.Findings: The concept of reputation risk management could assist in the understanding of corporate social responsibility reporting practice.Originality/value: This paper explores the link between reputation risk management and existing theorising in social accounting.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony?Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2004
- Reputation costs: the impetus for voluntary derivative financial instrument reportingAccounting, Organizations and Society, 2004
- The Manufacture of Corporate Social Responsibility: Constructing Corporate SensibilityOrganization, 2003
- Comparing Corporate Reputations: League Tables, Quotients, Benchmarks, or Case Studies?Corporate Reputation Review, 2002
- Do Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Contribute to Explaining Differences in Corporate Price-Earnings Ratios? A Research NoteCorporate Reputation Review, 2000
- Environmental disclosure: Corporate use of the world wide webCorporate Environmental Strategy, 1998
- Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really CountsAcademy of Management Review, 1997
- IntroductionBusiness & Society, 1995
- The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and ImplicationsAcademy of Management Review, 1995
- STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSESAcademy of Management Review, 1991