Determinants of discordance in patients' and physicians' rating of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity
Open Access
- 2 November 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis Care & Research
- Vol. 64 (2), 206-214
- https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20685
Abstract
Objective To assess the determinants of patients' (PTGL) and physicians' (MDGL) global assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) activity and factors associated with discordance among them. Methods A total of 7,028 patients in the Quantitative Standard Monitoring of Patients with RA study had PTGL and MDGL assessed at the same clinic visit on a 0–10‐cm visual analog scale (VAS). Three patient groups were defined: concordant rating group (PTGL and MDGL within ±2 cm), higher patient rating group (PTGL exceeding MDGL by >2 cm), and lower patient rating group (PTGL less than MDGL by >2 cm). Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify determinants of PTGL and MDGL and their discordance. Results The mean ± SD VAS scores for PTGL and MDGL were 4.01 ± 2.70 and 2.91 ± 2.37, respectively. Pain was overwhelmingly the single most important determinant of PTGL, followed by fatigue. In contrast, MDGL was most influenced by swollen joint count (SJC), followed by erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and tender joint count (TJC). A total of 4,454 (63.4%), 2,106 (30%), and 468 (6.6%) patients were in the concordant, higher, and lower patient rating groups, respectively. Odds of higher patient rating increased with higher pain, fatigue, psychological distress, age, and morning stiffness, and decreased with higher SJC, TJC, and ESR. Lower patient rating odds increased with higher SJC, TJC, and ESR, and decreased with lower fatigue levels. Conclusion Nearly 36% of patients had discordance in RA activity assessment from their physicians. Sensitivity to the “disease experience” of patients, particularly pain and fatigue, is warranted for effective care of RA.This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient‐physician discordance in assessments of global disease severity in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis Care & Research, 2010
- Health Literacy Predicts the Discrepancy Between Patient and Provider Global Assessments of Rheumatoid Arthritis Activity at a Public Urban Rheumatology ClinicThe Journal of Rheumatology, 2010
- Predicting depression in rheumatoid arthritis: The signal importance of pain extent and fatigue, and comorbidityArthritis Care & Research, 2009
- Perception of improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis varies with disease activity levels at baselineArthritis Care & Research, 2009
- QUEST-RA: quantitative clinical assessment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis seen in standard rheumatology care in 15 countriesAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2007
- Rheumatology care, patient expectations, and the limits of timeArthritis Care & Research, 2004
- Predicting reports of unmet expectations among rheumatology patientsArthritis Care & Research, 2004
- Values for function in rheumatoid arthritis: patients, professionals, and publicAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2001
- Lack of Congruence in the Ratings of Patients' Health Status by Patients and Their PhysiciansMedical Decision Making, 2001
- A self‐administered rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index (RADAI) for epidemiologic researchArthritis & Rheumatism, 1995