Values for function in rheumatoid arthritis: patients, professionals, and public
- 1 October 2001
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases
- Vol. 60 (10), 928-933
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.60.10.928
Abstract
Although many disability questionnaires measure fact very efficiently, they do not allow for consideration of the relevance of that disability to the patient. Data suggest that professionals misinterpret the relevance of disability for the patient and thus, also, the outcome of treatment. Firstly, to examine agreement on levels of importance for the items on a validated disability scale (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Modified HAQ (MHAQ)), within groups of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, health professionals, and controls. Secondly, to see if functional items important to patients are included in the HAQ, and whether the HAQ items are important to patients. 25 patients with RA, 25 rheumatology health professionals, and 25 healthy controls were asked to rate the importance of the HAQ (20 items) and MHAQ (eight domains). Before seeing the HAQ, patients were asked to generate items of function important to them. Only a slight-fair agreement within each group was found for the level of importance of the HAQ and MHAQ, and also within any combination of the groups (kappa values <0.38). Most of the functional items valued by patients were contained on the HAQ (70%), and no HAQ items were consistently rated as unimportant. Patients, professionals, and healthy controls do not agree on the importance of disabilities. These data support the need to assess the personal impact of disability, as well as disability itself. Individual importance of disability weighted by level of disability is proposed as a model for calculating the personal impact of disability. A new tool to assess the personal impact of disability is being developed.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- How does functional disability in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affect patients and their lives? Results of 5 years of follow‐up in 732 patients from the Early RA Study (ERAS)Rheumatology, 2000
- Measurement of the quality of life in rheumatic disorders using the EuroQol.Rheumatology, 1997
- Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?British Journal of Cancer, 1988
- The historical and conceptual framework for functional assessment in rheumatic disease.1987
- The status of patient status measures.1987
- Weights for Scoring the Quality of Well-being Instrument Among Rheumatoid ArthriticsMedical Care, 1986
- STANFORD HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE MODIFIED TO ASSESS DISABILITY IN BRITISH PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITISRheumatology, 1986
- Severely Mobility-Disabled People Assess the Quality of Their LivesJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1985
- Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified stanford health assessment questionnaireArthritis & Rheumatism, 1983
- Measuring health status in arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1980