The Table 2 Fallacy: Presenting and Interpreting Confounder and Modifier Coefficients
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 30 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 177 (4), 292-298
- https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws412
Abstract
It is common to present multiple adjusted effect estimates from a single model in a single table. For example, a table might show odds ratios for one or more exposures and also for several confounders from a single logistic regression. This can lead to mistaken interpretations of these estimates. We use causal diagrams to display the sources of the problems. Presentation of exposure and confounder effect estimates from a single model may lead to several interpretative difficulties, inviting confusion of direct-effect estimates with total-effect estimates for covariates in the model. These effect estimates may also be confounded even though the effect estimate for the main exposure is not confounded. Interpretation of these effect estimates is further complicated by heterogeneity (variation, modification) of the exposure effect measure across covariate levels. We offer suggestions to limit potential misunderstandings when multiple effect estimates are presented, including precise distinction between total and direct effect measures from a single model, and use of multiple models tailored to yield total-effect estimates for covariates.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adjustments and their Consequences-Collapsibility Analysis using Graphical ModelsInternational Statistical Review, 2011
- Splines for Trend Analysis and Continuous Confounder ControlEpidemiology, 2011
- Odds Ratios for Mediation Analysis for a Dichotomous OutcomeAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Invited Commentary: Decomposing with a Lot of SupposingAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Generalizing Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials to Target Populations: The ACTG 320 TrialAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Invited Commentary: Positivity in PracticeAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- On the Distinction Between Interaction and Effect ModificationEpidemiology, 2009
- Commentary: Gilding the black boxInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
- Dose-Response and Trend Analysis in EpidemiologyEpidemiology, 1995
- The interpretation of multiplicative‐model parameters as standardized parametersStatistics in Medicine, 1994