Invited Commentary: Decomposing with a Lot of Supposing
Open Access
- 29 October 2010
- journal article
- comment
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 172 (12), 1349-1351
- https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq329
Abstract
In this issue of the Journal, VanderWeele and Vansteelandt (Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(12):1339–1348) provide simple formulae for estimation of direct and indirect effects using standard logistic regression when the exposure and outcome are binary, the mediator is continuous, and the odds ratio is the chosen effect measure. They also provide concisely stated lists of assumptions necessary for estimation of these effects, including various conditional independencies and homogeneity of exposure and mediator effects over covariate strata. They further suggest that this will allow effect decomposition in case-control studies if the sampling fractions and population outcome prevalence are known with certainty. In this invited commentary, the author argues that, in a well-designed case-control study in which the sampling fraction is known, it should not be necessary to rely on the odds ratio. The odds ratio has well-known deficiencies as a causal parameter, and its use severely complicates evaluation of confounding and effect homogeneity. Although VanderWeele and Vansteelandt propose that a rare disease assumption is not necessary for estimation of controlled direct effects using their approach, collapsibility concerns suggest otherwise when the goal is causal inference rather than merely measuring association. Moreover, their clear statement of assumptions necessary for the estimation of natural/pure effects suggests that these quantities will rarely be viable estimands in observational epidemiology.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Odds Ratios for Mediation Analysis for a Dichotomous OutcomeAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- MarginaliaEpidemiology, 2010
- Case-Control Studies = Odds RatiosEpidemiology, 2010
- Marginal Structural Models for the Estimation of Direct and Indirect EffectsEpidemiology, 2009
- Easy SAS Calculations for Risk or Prevalence Ratios and DifferencesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- Fallibility in estimating direct effects.International Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- Confounding in Health ResearchAnnual Review of Public Health, 2001
- Causal diagrams for empirical researchBiometrika, 1995
- Identifiability and Exchangeability for Direct and Indirect EffectsEpidemiology, 1992
- A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effectMathematical Modelling, 1986