Research methods for subgrouping low back pain
Open Access
- 3 July 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 10 (1), 62
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-62
Abstract
There is considerable clinician and researcher interest in whether the outcomes for patients with low back pain, and the efficiency of the health systems that treat them, can be improved by 'subgrouping research'. Subgrouping research seeks to identify subgroups of people who have clinically important distinctions in their treatment needs or prognoses. Due to a proliferation of research methods and variability in how subgrouping results are interpreted, it is timely to open discussion regarding a conceptual framework for the research designs and statistical methods available for subgrouping studies (a method framework). The aims of this debate article are: (1) to present a method framework to inform the design and evaluation of subgrouping research in low back pain, (2) to describe method options when investigating prognostic effects or subgroup treatment effects, and (3) to discuss the strengths and limitations of research methods suitable for the hypothesis-setting phase of subgroup studies. The proposed method framework proposes six phases for studies of subgroups: studies of assessment methods, hypothesis-setting studies, hypothesis-testing studies, narrow validation studies, broad validation studies, and impact analysis studies. This framework extends and relabels a classification system previously proposed by McGinn et al (2000) as suitable for studies of clinical prediction rules. This extended classification, and its descriptive terms, explicitly anchor research findings to the type of evidence each provides. The inclusive nature of the framework invites appropriate consideration of the results of diverse research designs. Method pathways are described for studies designed to test and quantify prognostic effects or subgroup treatment effects, and examples are discussed. The proposed method framework is presented as a roadmap for conversation amongst researchers and clinicians who plan, stage and perform subgrouping research. This article proposes a research method framework for studies of subgroups in low back pain. Research designs and statistical methods appropriate for sequential phases in this research are discussed, with an emphasis on those suitable for hypothesis-setting studies of subgroups of people seeking care.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identifying phases of investigation helps planning, appraising, and applying the results of explanatory prognosis studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- A primary care back pain screening tool: Identifying patient subgroups for initial treatmentArthritis Care & Research, 2008
- Independent evaluation of a clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulative therapy: a randomised controlled trialEuropean Spine Journal, 2008
- Preliminary Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Determining Which Patients With Low Back Pain Will Respond to a Stabilization Exercise ProgramArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2005
- Does it Matter Which Exercise?Spine, 2004
- A Clinical Prediction Rule for Classifying Patients with Low Back Pain Who Demonstrate Short-Term Improvement With Spinal ManipulationSpine, 2002
- Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practiceand problemsStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- A Report From the Second International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back PainSpine, 1998
- A Prospective Study of Centralization of Lumbar and Referred PainSpine, 1997
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986