Commentary on: Thornton JI. Letter to the editor-a rejection of “working blind” as a cure for contextual bias. J Forensic Sci 2010;55(6):1663
- 22 February 2011
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Vol. 56 (2), 562-563
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01679.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence?Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2011
- Letter to the Editor—A Rejection of “Working Blind” as a Cure for Contextual BiasJournal of Forensic Sciences, 2010
- Commentary on: Budowle B, Bottrell MC, Bunch SG, Fram R, Harrison D, Meagher S, Oien CT, Peterson PE, Seiger DP,Smith MB, Smrz MA, Soltis GL, Stacey RB. A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(4):798-809.Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2010
- Painting the target around the matching profile: the Texas sharpshooter fallacy in forensic DNA interpretationLaw, Probability and Risk, 2009
- Interpretation: Observer EffectsPublished by Wiley ,2009
- Sequential Unmasking: A Means of Minimizing Observer Effects in Forensic DNA InterpretationJournal of Forensic Sciences, 2008
- Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United StatesScience & Justice, 2003
- Motivated Reasoning and Performance on the was on Selection TaskPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2002
- The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and SuggestionCalifornia Law Review, 2002
- Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 1977