Motivated Reasoning and Performance on the was on Selection Task
Open Access
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 28 (10), 1379-1387
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702236869
Abstract
People tend to approach agreeable propositions with a bias toward confirmation and disagreeable propositions with a bias toward disconfirmation. Because the appropriate strategy for solving the four-card Wason selection task is to seek disconfirmation, the authors predicted that people motivated to reject a task rule should be more likely to solve the task than those without such motivation. In two studies, participants who considered a Wason task rule that implied their own early death (Study 1) or the validity of a threatening stereotype (Study 2) vastly outperformed participants who considered nonthreatening or agreeable rules. Discussion focuses on how a skeptical mindset may help people avoid confirmation bias both in the context of the Wason task and in everyday reasoning.This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- When bad isn't all bad: Strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995
- Content-Related Schemata Versus Verbal-Framing Effects in Deductive ReasoningSocial Cognition, 1994
- In-group favoritism and statistical reasoning in social inference: Implications for formation and maintenance of group stereotypes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992
- Facilitation in the Wason selection task with a consequent referring to an unsatisfactory outcomeBritish Journal of Psychology, 1991
- Social categorization and the formation of group stereotypes: Further evidence for biased information processing in the perception of group‐behavior correlationsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1991
- Pragmatic reasoning schemasCognitive Psychology, 1985
- The elusive thematic‐materials effect in Wason's selection taskBritish Journal of Psychology, 1982
- The effects of prior beliefs in reasoning: An associational interpretationBritish Journal of Psychology, 1981
- Facilitation of reasoning by realism: Effect or non‐effect?British Journal of Psychology, 1979
- REASONING AND A SENSE OF REALITYBritish Journal of Psychology, 1972