Testing non‐cognitive attributes in selection centres: how to avoid being reliably wrong
- 10 February 2012
- journal article
- comment
- Published by Wiley in Medical Education
- Vol. 46 (3), 240-242
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04193.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating cognitive ability, knowledge tests and situational judgement tests for postgraduate selectionMedical Education, 2012
- Reliability estimates: behavioural stations and questionnaires in medical school admissionsMedical Education, 2012
- The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2011
- Evaluating candidate reactions to selection practices using organisational justice theoryMedical Education, 2011
- Guidelines and Ethical Considerations for Assessment Center OperationsInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2009
- Using job analysis to identify core and specific competencies: implications for selection and recruitmentMedical Education, 2008
- ?I?m pickin' up good regressions': the governance of generalisability analysesMedical Education, 2007
- A new selection system to recruit general practice registrars: preliminary findings from a validation studyBMJ, 2005
- Assessor training strategies and their effects on accuracy, interrater reliability, and discriminant validity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959