Towards a More Inclusive and Dynamic Understanding of Medical Mistrust Informed by Science
Top Cited Papers
- 3 April 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Behavioral Medicine
- Vol. 45 (2), 79-85
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2019.1619511
Abstract
Mistrust of medical advances and the medical professions continues to persist, and is perhaps increasing. The popular press has documented the growing number of parents globally whose concerns around childhood vaccination, albeit based on faulty scientific information, has led to the anti-vax movement which has already resulted in outbreaks of measles in various parts of the U.S. In recent years, the AIDS Healthcare Foundation has increased speculation and mistrust with regard to the denialism of the effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to avert HIV infections, again based on misinformation. However, in other cases, medical mistrust reflects the very real historical and ongoing injustices experienced by socially and economically marginalized groups. Whether the genesis of the mistrust is based on fact or fallacy, the results may be similar. There are myriad negative consequences associated with medical mistrust, including lower utilization of healthcare and poorer management of health conditions. Mistrust is thought to provide a partial explanation for staggering health disparities, particularly among Black and African American people, and much of the public health and medical literature cites the infamous Tuskegee Study as a main catalyst for this persistent health-related mistrust among people of color and other groups who experience social and economic vulnerability. While mistrust is often referred to as a phenomenon existing within an individual or community, we must rethink this conceptualization and instead locate mistrust as a phenomenon created by and existing within a system that creates, sustains and reinforces racism, classism, homophobia and transphobia, and stigma. The purpose of this article is to briefly address the state of the medical mistrust literature, and to provide a summary of the articles included in this special issue on medical mistrust. Although the scholarship in this issue addresses diverse methodologies, outcomes and populations, they share a message: social inequality drives mistrust.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dead and AliveSocial Psychological and Personality Science, 2012
- Longitudinal Association of HIV Conspiracy Beliefs with Sexual Risk Among Black Males Living with HIVAIDS and Behavior, 2010
- Beliefs About Participating in Research Among a Sample of Minority Persons Living with HIV/AIDS in New York CityAIDS Patient Care and STDs, 2010
- Conspiracy Beliefs About HIV Are Related to Antiretroviral Treatment Nonadherence Among African American Men With HIVJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2010
- Mistrust of Health Care Organizations Is Associated with Underutilization of Health ServicesHealth Services Research, 2009
- HIV Testing and Conspiracy Beliefs Regarding the Origins of HIV among African AmericansAIDS Patient Care and STDs, 2009
- Conspiracy Beliefs about HIV Infection Are Common But Not Associated with Delayed Diagnosis or Adherence to CareAIDS Patient Care and STDs, 2008
- Differences in the Patterns of Health Care System Distrust Between Blacks and WhitesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Rasing the ivory tower: the production of knowledge and distrust of medicine among African AmericansJournal of Medical Ethics, 2007
- The Tuskegee Legacy Project: Willingness of Minorities to Participate in Biomedical ResearchJournal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 2006