Reporting the Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests: The STARD Initiative 10 Years On
- 1 June 2013
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Chemistry
- Vol. 59 (6), 917-919
- https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2013.206516
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical TrialsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2013
- The quality of reporting of primary test accuracy studies in obstetrics and gynaecology: application of the STARD criteriaBMC Women's Health, 2011
- STARD Statement: Still Room for Improvement in the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesRadiology, 2008
- Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'Trials, 2008
- CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and ElaborationPLoS Medicine, 2008
- Endorsement of the STARD Statement by Biomedical Journals: Survey of Instructions for AuthorsClinical Chemistry, 2007
- Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic AccuracyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD InitiativeClinical Chemistry, 2003
- “Sensitivity” and “Specificity” Reconsidered: The Meaning of These Terms in Analytical and Diagnostic SettingsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997