SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials
Open Access
- 5 February 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 158 (3), 200-207
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
Abstract
The protocol of a clinical trial serves as the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting, and appraisal. However, trial protocols and existing protocol guidelines vary greatly in content and quality. This article describes the systematic development and scope of SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) 2013, a guideline for the minimum content of a clinical trial protocol. The 33-item SPIRIT checklist applies to protocols for all clinical trials and focuses on content rather than format. The checklist recommends a full description of what is planned; it does not prescribe how to design or conduct a trial. By providing guidance for key content, the SPIRIT recommendations aim to facilitate the drafting of high-quality protocols. Adherence to SPIRIT would also enhance the transparency and completeness of trial protocols for the benefit of investigators, trial participants, patients, sponsors, funders, research ethics committees or institutional review boards, peer reviewers, journals, trial registries, policymakers, regulators, and other key stakeholders.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewaSystematic Reviews, 2012
- Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic reviewSystematic Reviews, 2012
- Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus surveyTrials, 2012
- Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocolsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2012
- Reporting of Methodologic Information on Trial Registries for Quality Assessment: A Study of Trial Records Retrieved from the WHO Search PortalPLOS ONE, 2010
- Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting GuidelinesPLoS Medicine, 2010
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting BiasPLOS ONE, 2008
- Ghost Authorship in Industry-Initiated Randomised TrialsPLoS Medicine, 2007
- A Taxpayer-Funded Clinical Trials Registry and Results DatabasePLoS Medicine, 2004
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2004