Systematic Review of Skin Graft Donor-Site Dressings
- 1 July 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 124 (1), 298-306
- https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181a8072f
Abstract
Debate continues about what split-thickness skin graft donor-site dressing provides the best outcomes for patients at the lowest cost. The goal of this systematic review was to determine which donor-site dressings are associated with the best outcomes for the following: pain, infection rate, healing quality, healing rate, quality of life, and cost. A comprehensive literature review and assessment was undertaken by two independent reviewers. Articles were selected using specific inclusion criteria. Split-thickness skin graft donor-site dressings were classified as either moist or nonmoist based on the state of the dressing upon initial application. Methodological quality of randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Jadad scale. Seventy-five relevant articles were included in the final analysis, three of which were review articles. The most commonly measured outcome was healing rate (64 of 72), followed by pain (58 of 72), infection rate (40 of 72), healing quality (40 of 72), and cost (15 of 72). No studies measured quality of life. The majority of articles were randomized controlled trials (35 of 75), followed by observational studies (22 of 75), unsystematic clinical observations (15 of 75), and review articles (three of 75). It was difficult to compare moist and nonmoist dressings in this review because of the methodological heterogeneity of the included articles. The available evidence suggests, however, that moist dressings are superior in terms of pain. Some weak evidence exists that supports “wet dressings.” To determine the best split-thickness skin graft donor-site dressing, more methodologically sound randomized controlled trials are needed. Trials with parallel economic evaluations should be undertaken to answer this question.Keywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Use of Cost-effectiveness Analysis in Plastic Surgery Clinical ResearchClinics in Plastic Surgery, 2008
- A polyurethane dressing is beneficial for split-thickness skin-graft donor wound healingClinical Dermatology and Surgery, 2006
- Clinical Comparative Study of Aquacel and Paraffin Gauze Dressing for Split-Skin Donor Site TreatmentAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2004
- Chitosan membrane as a wound‐healing dressing: Characterization and clinical applicationJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2004
- The use of moist wound‐healing dressings in the management of split‐thickness skin graft donor sites: a systematic reviewInternational Journal of Nursing Practice, 2003
- Split-thickness skin graft donor site care: a quantitative synthesis of the researchApplied Nursing Research, 1998
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Calcium alginate dressing accelerates split skin graft donor site healingBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1989
- Scalp as Skin Graft Donor SiteThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1983
- The treatment of split thickness skin graft donor sites using n-butyl and n-heptyl 2-cyanoacrylateBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1971