Developing clinically valid practice guidelines
- 1 August 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Vol. 1 (1), 37-48
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.1995.tb00006.x
Abstract
Valid guidelines, when appropriately disseminated and implemented, can lead to changes in clinical practice and improvements in patient outcome. Guidelines are more likely to be valid if they are developed using systematic reviews, national or regional guideline development groups (including representatives of key disciplines) and explicit links between recommenda- tions and scientific evidence. This paper discusses the practical implications of adopting this approach for guideline development and the role of peer review of guidelines as another element of the process to ensure validity. Considerable resources are required to develop evidence-linked guidelines, but this investment can be recouped by relatively small changes in the process or outcome of care. Good leadership and technical support are required for the successful development of clinically valid guidelines, which is dependent upon the small-group processes of guideline development panels and the translation of evidence into recommendations. Future guideline developers need to gain expertise in these areas. Research priorities are identified.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1995
- The Science of Reviewing ResearchaAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1993
- Can We Learn Anything from Small Trials?Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1993
- Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluationsThe Lancet, 1993
- Making Clinical Policy Explicit:Legislative Policy Making and Lessons for Developing Practice GuidelinesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1993
- Educational potential of medical audit: observations from a study of small groups setting standards.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1992
- A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarctionJAMA, 1992
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985
- Sensitivity and specificity of clinical trials. Randomized v historical controlsArchives of Internal Medicine, 1983
- Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trialsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1967