Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses assessed by composites of valve-related complications to 15 years after mitral valve replacement
- 30 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 129 (6), 1301-1308
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.09.042
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprosthesesHeart, 2003
- Mechanical or bioprosthetic valves in the elderly: a 20-year comparisonThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Comparison of bioprosthesis and mechanical valves, a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trialsCardiovascular Surgery, 2000
- Long-term performance of heart valve prosthesesCurrent Problems in Cardiology, 2000
- Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operationsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1996
- Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis: A ten-year comparison regarding function and quality of lifeThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- A Comparison of Outcomes in Men 11 Years after Heart-Valve Replacement with a Mechanical Valve or BioprosthesisThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Twelve-Year Comparison of a Bjork–Shiley Mechanical Heart Valve with Porcine BioprosthesesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Comparison of outcome after valve replacement with a bioprosthesis versus a mechanical prosthesis: Initial 5 year results of a randomized trialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987