Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis: A ten-year comparison regarding function and quality of life
- 31 August 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 60, S447-S452
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)00266-n
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Outcomes in Men 11 Years after Heart-Valve Replacement with a Mechanical Valve or BioprosthesisThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Twelve-Year Comparison of a Bjork–Shiley Mechanical Heart Valve with Porcine BioprosthesesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Comparison of occurrence of bleeding, systemic embolism, endocarditis, valve thrombosis and reoperation between patients randomized between a mechanical prosthesis and a bioprosthesis. Results from the VA randomized trialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Primary isolated aortic valve replacementThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1989
- Guidelines for Reporting Morbidity and Mortality after Cardiac Valvular OperationsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Carpentier-Edwards Standard Porcine Bioprosthesis: Primary Tissue Failure (Structural Valve Deterioration) by Age GroupsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Mechanical versus biological heart valves: a ten-year comparison in a single centreEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Biological versus mechanical valvesThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1987