Australia's decision to initiateWhaling in the Antarctic: winning the case versus resolving the dispute
- 31 October 2013
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Australian Journal of International Affairs
- Vol. 68 (1), 1-16
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2013.841121
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Whaling and its controversies: Examining the attitudes of Japan's youthMarine Policy, 2009
- Theatre sports in the Southern Ocean: engagement options for Australia in whale research protest actionAustralian Journal of International Affairs, 2009
- Intergovernmental Organizations as Disseminators, Legitimators, and Disguisers of Hegemonic Policy Preferences: The United States, the International Whaling Commission, and the Introduction of a Moratorium on Commercial WhalingLeiden Journal of International Law, 2008
- Legitimizing Dispute Settlement: International Legal Rulings as Domestic Political CoverAmerican Political Science Review, 2006
- Why Japan Supports WhalingJournal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, 2005
- Compliance with Decisions of the International Court of JusticePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2004
- Japan's renunciation of territorial rights in Antarctica and Australian diplomacyPolar Record, 1999
- Decisions to Use the International Court of Justice: Four Recent CasesInternational Studies Quarterly, 1982