Intergovernmental Organizations as Disseminators, Legitimators, and Disguisers of Hegemonic Policy Preferences: The United States, the International Whaling Commission, and the Introduction of a Moratorium on Commercial Whaling
- 1 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Leiden Journal of International Law
- Vol. 21 (3), 581-600
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0922156508005190
Abstract
The recognized benefits to a hegemon of working through an intergovernmental organization (IGO) include legitimating its policy preferences, disseminating them with efficiency, and promoting stability. While most would agree that international law is important in this process, it is less easy to map exactly how international law fulfils this role. Using the cognitive structures of co-operation (CSC) approach to the political interpretation of multilateral treaties, this article demonstrates at a relatively low level of abstraction the way in which a constitutive treaty embeds an ideational structure integral to the political relationships within the IGO. This can serve the interests of the hegemon but may also make it difficult for the hegemon to disseminate a fundamentally changed policy should its preferences alter. This paper uses the CSC theory of treaty interpretation to trace the under-recognized role of the United States in bringing about the 1982 adoption of a moratorium on commercial whaling by the International Whaling Commission.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does LegalityReallyMatter? Accounting for the Decline in US Foreign Policy Legitimacy Following the 2003 Invasion of IraqEuropean Journal of International Relations, 2007
- Multilateralism in a unipolar world: the UN Security Council and IraqInternational Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 2006
- The Relevance of International Law for Foreign Policy Decision-making When National Security Is at Stake: Lessons from the Cuban Missile CrisisChinese Journal of International Law, 2004
- The Search for Meaning: continuing Problems with the Interpretation of TreatiesVictoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2002
- Why States Act through Formal International OrganizationsJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1998
- Universalism and Title to Territory in AntarcticaNordic Journal of International Law, 1997
- The International Convention for the Regulation of WhalingThe International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 1997
- Science and politics in the international management of whalesMarine Policy, 1989
- Theory and Practice of Treaty Interpretation*Netherlands International Law Review, 1980
- Transnational Resource Conflict: The Politics of WhalingInternational Studies Quarterly, 1980