Ethical and Legal Implications in Seeking and Providing a Second Medical Opinion
- 1 December 2007
- journal article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Digestive Diseases
- Vol. 26 (1), 11-17
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000109379
Abstract
Ethical and legal implications arise both when seeking a second medical opinion and when providing one. There has been debate as to whether a second opinion for a patient is a right or a concession and whilst today most would consider it to be a patient's right, there are nevertheless some disadvantages associated with seeking a second opinion. This article addresses the reasons why patients seek second opinions, it considers when physicians themselves should refer patients and it covers the issues involved in providing a second opinion particularly in cases where there is the potential for an allegation of malpractice. Finally, the arguments for and against treating patients who are referred for a second opinion are addressed. This paper has been prepared following a round table discussion on this subject, which was addressed during a symposium on Ethics in Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy held in Kos in 2006.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Discrepancy between second and first opinion in surgical oncological patientsEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2006
- Personal view: passing the buck and taking a free ride – a game‐theoretical approach to evasive management strategies in gastroenterologyAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2005
- Surgical pathological second opinion in thyroid malignancy: impact on patients' management and prognosisEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2005
- The impact of second opinion surgical pathology on the practice of head and neck surgery: A decade experience at a large referral hospitalHead & Neck, 2002
- Are second opinions a right or a concession?BMJ, 1995
- Second opinions for patients with cancerBMJ, 1995
- Ethical issuesBMJ, 1995
- Limitations of psychiatryBMJ, 1995
- DOING WHAT THE PATIENT ORDERS: MAINTAINING INTEGRITY IN THE DOCTOR‐PATIENT RELATIONSHIPBioethics, 1993
- Second opinionsBMJ, 1988