Abstract
'Free-riding' physicians enjoy the status, prestige and income of their profession without fully contributing to its overall mission. By shifting the costs of potential medical complications and difficult patient encounters to other physicians, they reap the benefits of their profession without carrying its full weight. To describe this phenomenon in terms of decision analysis and characterize the parameters affecting its occurrence. The interaction between two physicians is modeled as a non-zero-sum game. Two strategies of either contributing to patient management or taking a free ride are available to both physicians. The four possible outcomes are arranged in a two-by-two game matrix. Physicians practice medicine because their personal benefit exceeds their cost. High cost to the physician results in a high probability of taking a free ride and copping out from potentially risky management. Increasing the benefit decreases the probability of free riding. As the number of possible encounters with other physicians increases, the probability of free riding increases and the probability for effective management by each individual physician decreases. If individual gastroenterologists felt less threatened by administrative repercussions and medico-legal consequences of untoward events, each one of them would contribute more to effective patient management.

This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit: