Selecting pseudo‐absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many?
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 19 January 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Vol. 3 (2), 327-338
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00172.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sampling in ecology and evolution – bridging the gap between theory and practiceEcography, 2010
- How much do we overestimate future local extinction rates when restricting the range of occurrence data in climate suitability models?Ecography, 2010
- Uncertainty in ensemble forecasting of species distributionGlobal Change Biology, 2010
- I can't define the niche but I know it when I see it: a formal link between statistical theory and the ecological nicheOikos, 2010
- Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS)Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006
- Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence dataEcography, 2006
- Presence‐absence versus presence‐only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitabilityEcography, 2004
- An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo‐absence dataJournal of Applied Ecology, 2004
- Assessment of alternative approaches for bioclimatic modeling with special emphasis on the Mahalanobis distanceEcological Modelling, 2003
- A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence modelsEnvironmental Conservation, 1997