Observational and interventional study design types; an overview
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 January 2014
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Croatian Society for Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine in Biochemia Medica
- Vol. 24 (2), 199-210
- https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2014.022
Abstract
The appropriate choice in study design is essential for the successful execution of biomedical and public health research. There are many study designs to choose from within two broad categories of observational and interventional studies. Each design has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the need to understand these limitations is necessary to arrive at correct study conclusions. Observational study designs, also called epidemiologic study designs, are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods. Observational study designs include ecological designs, cross sectional, case-control, case-crossover, retrospective and prospective cohorts. An important subset of observational studies is diagnostic study designs, which evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic procedures and tests as compared to other diagnostic measures. These include diagnostic accuracy designs, diagnostic cohort designs, and diagnostic randomized controlled trials. Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease. Each study design has specific outcome measures that rely on the type and quality of data utilized. Additionally, each study design has potential limitations that are more severe and need to be addressed in the design phase of the study. This manuscript is meant to provide an overview of study design types, strengths and weaknesses of common observational and interventional study designs.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health careCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2010
- An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methodsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004
- The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trialsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2001
- Physician interpretations and textbook definitions of blinding terminology in randomized controlled trials.Jama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2001
- What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trialsBMJ, 1999
- Cardiovascular and cancer mortality among Canadians of European, south Asian and Chinese origin from 1979 to 1993: an analysis of 1.2 million deaths.1999
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Selection of Controls in Case-Control Studies: II. Types of ControlsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- Analysis of relative survival and proportional mortalityComputers and Biomedical Research, 1974
- The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1965