Conflicting factors in construction projects: Korean perspective
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
- Vol. 13 (6), 543-566
- https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980610712364
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this article is to identify and explore pertinent conflicting factors in construction projects; which would be helpful for project planners and implementers in assessing and taking proactive measures for reducing the adverse effect of conflict. Design/methodology/approach – To achieve the study objectives, a 43-item questionnaire survey in a five-point Likert scale was carried out to collect professionals' experience on conflicting activities in Korean construction projects. Responses from 124 professionals working for owners, consultants and contractors were analyzed. Furthermore, ten face-to face interviews were also carried out to ratify the findings from the field survey. Later, analytical hierarchical process method was employed to find out the importance weighting as well as responsible party for the perceived conflicts. Findings – This study has found out six critical construction conflicting factors pertinent in Korean context. These factors with importance weighting are: differing site condition (24.1 percent), public interruption (22.5 percent), differences in change order evaluation (21 percent), design errors (17.1 percent), excessive contract quantities variation (8.2) and double meaning of specifications (7.1 percent). The study has revealed that owner (35.6 percent) and consultant (34.18 percent) are mostly responsible parties for conflicts in construction projects. Originality/value – As the previous researches have been indicating increase in conflicts in construction field, this paper is very topical at the moment. This work has tried to explore the underlying problems of the construction field. The study provides field level experiences from which the inexperience construction site professionals could learn the instances of conflicts and not repeat the mistakes in their projects.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Critical construction conflicting factors identification using analytical hierarchy processKSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2006
- Disputes and Dispute Resolution Systems in Sino-Foreign Joint Venture Construction Projects in ChinaJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2005
- Large construction projects in developing countries: a case study from VietnamInternational Journal of Project Management, 2004
- Potential for Implementing Relational Contracting and Joint Risk ManagementJournal of Management in Engineering, 2004
- Contracting Relationship Trends and TransitionsJournal of Management in Engineering, 2004
- The effect of attitudinal differences on interface conflicts in large scale construction projects: a case studyConstruction Management and Economics, 2002
- Risk and its management in the Kuwaiti construction industry: a contractors’ perspectiveInternational Journal of Project Management, 2001
- Conflict and dispute in constructionConstruction Management and Economics, 1997
- At the cutting edge: conflict avoidance and resolution in the US construction industryConstruction Management and Economics, 1997
- Construction delays in a fast-growing economy: Comparing Thailand with other economiesInternational Journal of Project Management, 1996