Potential for Implementing Relational Contracting and Joint Risk Management
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Management in Engineering
- Vol. 20 (4), 178-189
- https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2004)20:4(178)
Abstract
This paper focuses on the outcomes of the second survey in a broad Hong Kong-based study on joint risk management (JRM) through relational contracting (RC). The questionnaire survey itself focused on issues relating to the formation of a coalesced team for JRM at the postcontract stage, comprising owners, consultants, contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers. Results indicate the greater importance of more relational, trust, and joint responsibility-related factors in general, both for selecting different parties and for building a successful relational contract. While some differences in group perceptions emerge, respondents recommend mobilizing project participants at earlier stages of projects, that is, mostly before the contract award, and they strongly support the JRM option for managing various unforeseen risks. Respondents also suggest adjustment/extension of contract provisions for managing unforeseen events, indicating emerging preferences for flexibility in contracts. All these are indicative of a perceived trend toward more RC, teamworking, and collaborative working environments.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk management trends in the construction industry: moving towards joint risk managementEngineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2002
- A model for supporting inter-organizational relations in the supply chainEngineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2002
- Effective Wording to Improve Risk Allocation in Lump Sum ContractsJournal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1997
- Causes of High Costs of Construction in NigeriaJournal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1988
- The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual RelationsPublished by JSTOR ,1981