A study of the factors that influence how senior officers police crowd events: On SIDE outside the laboratory
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- website
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 45 (1), 175-196
- https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605x41364
Abstract
This paper fits into the SIDE perspective ( Reicher, Spears, & Postmes, 1995 ; Postmes, Spears, Lea, & Reicher, 2000 ), which emphasises the importance of integrating the cognitive and strategic dimensions of group processes. Our study examines the decisions made by senior police officers during a simulation exercise of a crowd event. The analysis shows, firstly, that officers are deeply concerned about their accountability to a variety of audiences, both internal and external to the police force. Second, these different audiences pressure them to act in different, and sometimes contradictory, ways. What counts, then, is the overall balance between accountability concerns. Third, this balance – and, with it, police perceptions and decisions – alters in the course of an event. More specifically, with escalating conflict, the balance of accountability concerns moves increasingly in the direction of undifferentiated intervention against crowd members. In discussion, we consider both the theoretical implications of this analysis for research on group processes (in particular the importance of accountability issues once one moves beyond the laboratory and deals with groups that have a past and future and in which membership is more than simply an act of choice) and the practical implications in terms of crowd policing.This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- When group representations serve social change: The speeches of Patrice Lumumba during the Congolese decolonizationBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 2003
- The Role of Police Perceptions and Practices in the Development of “Public Disorder”1,2Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2003
- “How European am I?”: Prejudice Expression and the Presentation of Social IdentitySelf and Identity, 2003
- Who wants to know? The effect of audience on identity expression among minority group membersBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 2003
- Self and Social IdentityAnnual Review of Psychology, 2002
- You Can’t Always Do What You Want: Social Identity and Self-Presentational Determinants of the Choice to Work for a Low-Status GroupPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2000
- Intergroup Differentiation in Social Context: Identity Needs versus Audience ConstraintsSocial Psychology Quarterly, 2000
- The Intergroup Dynamics of Collective Empowerment: Substantiating the Social Identity Model of Crowd BehaviorGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1999
- Accounting for the effects of accountability.Psychological Bulletin, 1999
- Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1998