Accounting for the effects of accountability.
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 125 (2), 255-275
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255
Abstract
This article reviews the now extensive research literature addressing the impact of accountability on a wide range of social judgments and choices. It focuses on issues: (a) What impact do various accountability ground rules have on thoughts, feelings, and action? (b) Under what conditions will accountability attenuate, have no effect on, or amplify cognitive biases? (c) Does accountability alter how people think or merely what people say they think? and (d) What goals do accountable decision makers seek to achieve? In addition, this review explores the broader implications of accountability research. It highlights the utility of treating thought as a process of internalized dialogue; the importance of documenting social and institutional boundary conditions on putative cognitive biases; and the potential to craft empirical answers to such applied problems as how to structure accountability relationships in organizations.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- ACCOUNTABILITY AND AUDITORS' JUDGMENTS ABOUT CONTINGENT EVENTSJournal of Business Finance & Accounting, 1996
- An Exploratory Study of Choice Rules Favored for High‐Stakes DecisionsJournal of Consumer Psychology, 1995
- Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out‐groupBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 1994
- Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994
- Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations.Psychological Bulletin, 1994
- Deescalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1992
- MANAGING GROUP DECISION MAKING PROCESSES: INDIVIDUAL VERSUS COLLECTIVE ACCOUNTABILITY AND GROUPTHINKInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 1991
- Accountability: A Social Check on the Fundamental Attribution ErrorSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1985
- Impression management versus intrapsychic explanations in social psychology: A useful dichotomy?Psychological Review, 1985
- The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution ProcessPublished by Elsevier BV ,1977