Interventions to Improve Follow-up of Positive Results on Fecal Blood Tests
- 10 October 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 167 (8), 565-575
- https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-1361
Abstract
Fecal immunochemical testing is the most commonly used method for colorectal cancer screening worldwide. However, its effectiveness is frequently undermined by failure to obtain follow-up colonoscopy after positive test results. To evaluate interventions to improve rates of follow-up colonoscopy for adults after a positive result on a fecal test (guaiac or immunochemical). English-language studies from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Embase from database inception through June 2017. Randomized and nonrandomized studies reporting an intervention for colonoscopy follow-up of asymptomatic adults with positive fecal test results. Two reviewers independently extracted data and ranked study quality; 2 rated overall strength of evidence for each category of study type. Twenty-three studies were eligible for analysis, including 7 randomized and 16 nonrandomized studies. Three were at low risk of bias. Eleven studies described patient-level interventions (changes to invitation, provision of results or follow-up appointments, and patient navigators), 5 provider-level interventions (reminders or performance data), and 7 system-level interventions (automated referral, precolonoscopy telephone calls, patient registries, and quality improvement efforts). Moderate evidence supported patient navigators and provider reminders or performance data. Evidence for system-level interventions was low. Seventeen studies reported the proportion of test-positive patients who completed colonoscopy compared with a control population, with absolute differences of −7.4 percentage points (95% CI, −19 to 4.3 percentage points) to 25 percentage points (CI, 14 to 35 percentage points). More than half of studies were at high or very high risk of bias; heterogeneous study designs and characteristics precluded meta-analysis. Patient navigators and giving providers reminders or performance data may help improve colonoscopy rates of asymptomatic adults with positive fecal blood test results. Current evidence about useful system-level interventions is scant and insufficient. National Cancer Institute. (PROSPERO: CRD42016048286)Keywords
Funding Information
- Krebsliga Schweiz (BIL KFS-3720-08-2015)
- National Cancer Institute (U54 CA163262)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur F�rderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (P2BEP3_165409)
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Road Ahead: What if Gastroenterologists Were Accountable for Preventing Colorectal Cancer?Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2013
- Patient Navigation Improves Cancer Diagnostic Resolution: An Individually Randomized Clinical Trial in an Underserved PopulationCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2012
- A Cluster Randomized Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Patient Navigation in Improving Quality of Diagnostic Care for Patients with Breast or Colorectal Cancer AbnormalitiesCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2012
- Improving the Follow-Up of Positive Hemoccult Screening Tests: An Electronic InterventionJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2011
- Lack of Follow-up After Fecal Occult Blood Testing in Older AdultsJAMA Internal Medicine, 2011
- Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communicationBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2009
- Using a Multifaceted Approach to Improve the Follow-Up of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test ResultsThe American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2009
- Effectiveness of a Provider Reminder on Fecal Occult Blood Test Follow-upDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 2009
- Time from Positive Screening Fecal Occult Blood Test to Colonoscopy and Risk of NeoplasiaDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 2008
- Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood testThe Lancet, 1996