A Cluster Randomized Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Patient Navigation in Improving Quality of Diagnostic Care for Patients with Breast or Colorectal Cancer Abnormalities
- 1 October 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 21 (10), 1664-1672
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-0448
Abstract
Background: This study examines efficacy of a lay patient navigation (PN) program aimed to reduce time between a cancer abnormality and definitive diagnosis among racially/ethnically diverse and medically underserved populations of Tampa Bay, Florida. Methods: Using a cluster randomized design, the study consisted of 11 clinics (six navigated; five control). Patients were navigated from time of a breast or colorectal abnormality to diagnostic resolution, and to completion of cancer treatment. Using a generalized mixed-effects model to assess intervention effects, we examined: (i) length of time between abnormality and definitive diagnosis, and (ii) receipt of definitive diagnosis within the 6-month minimum follow-up period. Results: A total of 1,267 patients participated (588 navigated; 679 control). We also included data from an additional 309 chart abstractions (139 navigated arm; 170 control arm) that assessed outcomes at baseline. PN did not have a significant effect on time to diagnostic resolution in multivariable analysis that adjusted for race-ethnicity, language, insurance status, marital status, and cancer site (P = 0.16). Although more navigated patients achieved diagnostic resolution by 180 days, results were not statistically significant (74.5% navigated vs. 68.5% control, P = 0.07). Conclusions: PN did not impact the overall time to completion of diagnostic care or the number of patients who reached diagnostic resolution of a cancer abnormality. Further evaluation of PN programs applied to other patient populations across the cancer continuum is necessary to gain a better perspective on its effectiveness. Impact: PN programs may not impact timely resolution of an abnormality suspicious of breast or colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(10); 1664–72. ©2012 AACR.This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Peer navigation improves diagnostic follow-up after breast cancer screening among Korean American women: results of a randomized trialCancer Causes & Control, 2010
- Racial differences in follow‐up of abnormal mammography findings among economically disadvantaged womenCancer, 2009
- Cancer treatment adherence among low‐income women with breast or gynecologic cancerCancer, 2009
- Challenges in the Management of Positive Fecal Occult Blood TestsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2009
- A Culturally Tailored Navigator Program for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Community Health Center: A Randomized, Controlled TrialJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research ProgramCancer, 2008
- Patient navigation: State of the art or is it science?Cancer, 2008
- The Effect of Patient Navigation on Time to Diagnosis, Anxiety, and Satisfaction in Urban Minority Women with Abnormal Mammograms: A Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of Urban Health, 2007
- Evaluation of an Intervention to Increase Screening Colonoscopy in an Urban Public Hospital SettingJournal of Urban Health, 2006
- Patient Navigation: A Community Based Strategy to Reduce Cancer DisparitiesJournal of Urban Health, 2006