A Validation Study of Multicenter Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Reliability of Fractional Anisotropy and Diffusivity Values
Open Access
- 15 December 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR) in American Journal of Neuroradiology
- Vol. 33 (4), 695-700
- https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a2844
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DTI is increasingly being used as a measure to study tissue damage in several neurologic diseases. Our aim was to investigate the comparability of DTI measures between different MR imaging magnets and platforms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two healthy volunteers underwent DTI on five 3T MR imaging scanners (3 Trios and 2 Signas) by using a matched 33 noncollinear diffusion-direction pulse sequence. Within each subject, a total of 16 white matter (corpus callosum, periventricular, and deep white matter) and gray matter (cortical and deep gray) ROIs were drawn on a single image set and then were coregistered to the other images. Mean FA, ADC, and longitudinal and transverse diffusivities were calculated within each ROI. Concordance correlations were derived by comparing ROI DTI values among each of the 5 magnets. RESULTS: Mean concordance for FA was 0.96; for both longitudinal and transverse diffusivities, it was 0.93; and for ADC, it was 0.88. Mean scan-rescan concordance was 0.96–0.97 for all DTI measures. Concordance correlations within platforms were, in general, better than those between platforms for all DTI measures (mean concordance of 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: We found that a 3T magnet and high-angular-resolution pulse sequence yielded comparable DTI measurements across different MR imaging magnets and platforms. Our results indicate that FA is the most comparable measure across magnets, followed by individual diffusivities. The comparability of DTI measures between different magnets supports the feasibility of multicentered clinical trials by using DTI as an outcome measure.This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring Myelin Repair and Axonal Loss with Diffusion Tensor ImagingAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 2010
- Identical, but not the same: Intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0T scannersNeuroImage, 2010
- Intercenter differences in diffusion tensor MRI acquisitionJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2010
- Picturing Multiple Sclerosis: Conventional and Diffusion Tensor ImagingSeminars in Neurology, 2008
- Reproducibility, Interrater Agreement, and Age-Related Changes of Fractional Anisotropy Measures at 3T in Healthy Subjects: Effect of the Applied b-ValueAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 2008
- Reproducibility of Quantitative Cerebral T2 Relaxometry, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, and 1H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 3.0 TeslaInvestigative Radiology, 2007
- Between session reproducibility and between subject variability of diffusion MR and tractography measuresNeuroImage, 2006
- Applications of Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging in Multiple SclerosisAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2005
- Replicability of diffusion tensor imaging measurements of fractional anisotropy and trace in brainJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2003
- Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging for characterizing diffuse and focal white matter abnormalities in multiple sclerosisMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2000