Identical, but not the same: Intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0T scanners
Open Access
- 15 July 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in NeuroImage
- Vol. 51 (4), 1384-1394
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.046
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- Wellcome Trust (079474)
- The Big Lottery Fund
- Wolfson Trust
- National Society for Epilepsy
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reproducibility, Interrater Agreement, and Age-Related Changes of Fractional Anisotropy Measures at 3T in Healthy Subjects: Effect of the Applied b-ValueAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 2008
- A method for improving the performance of gradient systems for diffusion‐weighted MRIMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2007
- Reproducibility of Quantitative Cerebral T2 Relaxometry, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, and 1H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 3.0 TeslaInvestigative Radiology, 2007
- Between session reproducibility and between subject variability of diffusion MR and tractography measuresNeuroImage, 2006
- Comparison of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Measurements at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T with and without Parallel ImagingNeuroimaging Clinics of North America, 2006
- Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion‐weighted MR imagingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2003
- Replicability of diffusion tensor imaging measurements of fractional anisotropy and trace in brainJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2003
- From diffusion tractography to quantitative white matter tract measures: a reproducibility studyNeuroImage, 2003
- Isotropic resolution diffusion tensor imaging with whole brain acquisition in a clinically acceptable timeHuman Brain Mapping, 2002
- On the effects of gating in diffusion imaging of the brain using single shot EPIMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 2001