The diagnostic performance of scoring systems to identify symptomatic colorectal cancer compared to current referral guidance
- 25 February 2011
- Vol. 60 (9), 1242-1248
- https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2010.225987
Abstract
Objectives To determine the discrimination characteristics of a new algorithm and two existing symptom scoring systems for identification of patients with suspected colorectal cancer. Design Derivation of algorithm by a case–control study and assessment of discrimination characteristics using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Three colorectal cancer scoring systems were investigated. The Bristol–Birmingham (BB) equation, which we derived from a large primary care dataset; the CAPER score, previously derived from a primary care case–control study and a symptom score derived from National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance for urgent referral of symptomatic patients. Their discrimination characteristics were investigated in two datasets: the BB derivation dataset and the CAPER score derivation dataset. The main analyses were ROC curves and the areas under them for all three algorithms in both datasets. Setting Electronic primary care databases. Main outcome measures Diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Results In the BB dataset, areas under the curve were: BB equation 0.83 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.84); CAPER 0.79 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.80); the NICE guidelines 0.65 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.66). In the CAPER dataset, areas under the curve were: BB 0.92 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.94); CAPER 0.91 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.93); NICE guidelines 0.75 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.79). In subjects under 50 the discrimination characteristics of NICE referral guidelines were no better than chance. Conclusions Both multivariable symptom scoring systems performed significantly better than NICE referral guidelines.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The size of the prize for earlier diagnosis of cancer in EnglandBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009
- A visual summary of the EUROCARE-4 results: a UK perspectiveBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Cancer survival in England and the influence of early diagnosis: what can we learn from recent EUROCARE results?British Journal of Cancer, 2009
- The CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patientsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Five misconceptions in cancer diagnosisBritish Journal of General Practice, 2009
- Diagnostic value of self-reported symptoms in Danish outpatients referred with symptoms consistent with colorectal cancerColorectal Disease, 2007
- The effects of the Two-Week Rule on NHS colorectal cancer diagnostic services: A systematic literature reviewBMC Health Services Research, 2006
- Pathways to the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: an observational study in three UK citiesFamily Practice, 2005
- Clinical features of colorectal cancer before diagnosis: a population-based case–control studyBritish Journal of Cancer, 2005
- Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working?BMJ, 2001