Five misconceptions in cancer diagnosis
Open Access
- 1 June 2009
- journal article
- Published by Royal College of General Practitioners in British Journal of General Practice
- Vol. 59 (563), 441-447
- https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09x420860
Abstract
Much investment has been put into facilities for early cancer diagnosis. It is difficult to know how successful this investment has been. New facilities for rapid investigation in the UK have not reduced mortality, and may cause delays in diagnosis of patients with low-risk, or atypical, symptoms. In part, the failure of new facilities to translate into mortality benefits can be explained by five misconceptions. These are described, along with suggested research and organisational remedies. The first misconception is that cancer is diagnosed in hospitals. Consequently, secondary care data have been used to drive primary care decisions. Second, GPs are thought to be poor at cancer diagnosis, yet the type of education on offer to improve this may not be what is needed. Third, symptomatic cancer diagnosis has been downgraded in importance with the introduction of screening, yet screening identifies only a small minority of cancers. Fourth, pressure is put on GPs to make referrals for those with an individual high risk of cancer — disenfranchising those with ‘low-risk but not no-risk’ symptoms. Finally, considerable nihilism exists about the value of early diagnosis, despite considerable observational evidence that earlier diagnosis of symptomatic cancer is beneficial.This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- The relationship between waiting time for radiotherapy and clinical outcomes: A systematic review of the literatureRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2008
- The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care recordsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2008
- The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in EnglandBritish Journal of Cancer, 2007
- Colorectal cancerBMJ, 2007
- Elevated serum matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) concentration predicts the presence of colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic patientsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2007
- Fast track referral for cancerBMJ, 2007
- Alarm symptoms in early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: cohort study using General Practice Research DatabaseBMJ, 2007
- Prioritization of colorectal referrals: a review of the 2‐week wait referral systemColorectal Disease, 2006
- The mortality of colorectal cancer in relation to the initial symptom at presentation to primary care and to the duration of symptoms: a cohort study using medical recordsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2006
- The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UKThe Lancet, 2004