Determination of Malignancy and Characterization of Hepatic Tumor Type With Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- 1 October 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Investigative Radiology
- Vol. 48 (10), 722-728
- https://doi.org/10.1097/rli.0b013e3182915912
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) determined with 3 b values and the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-derived parameters in the determination of malignancy and characterization of hepatic tumor type. Seventy-six patients with 86 solid hepatic lesions, including 8 hemangiomas, 20 lesions of focal nodular hyperplasia, 9 adenomas, 30 hepatocellular carcinomas, 13 metastases, and 6 cholangiocarcinomas, were assessed in this prospective study. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired with 11 b values to measure the ADCs (with b = 0, 150, and 500 s/mm) and the IVIM-derived parameters, namely, the pure diffusion coefficient and the perfusion-related diffusion fraction and coefficient. The diffusion parameters were compared between benign and malignant tumors and between tumor types, and their diagnostic value in identifying tumor malignancy was assessed. The apparent and pure diffusion coefficients were significantly higher in benign than in malignant tumors (benign: 2.32 [0.87] × 10 mm/s and 1.42 [0.37] × 10 mm/s vs malignant: 1.64 [0.51] × 10 mm/s and 1.14 [0.28] × 10 mm/s, respectively; P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0005), whereas the perfusion-related diffusion parameters did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The apparent and pure diffusion coefficients provided similar accuracy in assessing tumor malignancy (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.770 and 0.723, respectively). In the multigroup analysis, the ADC was found to be significantly higher in hemangiomas than in hepatocellular carcinomas, metastases, and cholangiocarcinomas. In the same manner, it was higher in lesions of focal nodular hyperplasia than in metastases and cholangiocarcinomas. However, the pure diffusion coefficient was significantly higher only in hemangiomas versus hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinomas. Compared with the ADC, the diffusion parameters derived from the IVIM model did not improve the determination of malignancy and characterization of hepatic tumor type.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostic Accuracy and Sensitivity of Diffusion-Weighted and of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced 3-T MR Imaging Alone or in Combination in the Detection of Small Liver Metastasis (≤1.5 cm in Diameter)Investigative Radiology, 2012
- New acquisition techniques: fields of applicationAbdominal Radiology, 2011
- New MR imaging criteria with a diffusion-weighted sequence for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic liver diseasesJournal of Hepatology, 2010
- Diagnosis of liver metastases: value of diffusion-weighted MRI compared with gadolinium-enhanced MRIEuropean Radiology, 2010
- Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the LiverRadiology, 2010
- Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and RecommendationsNeoplasia, 2009
- Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Serial Early Vascular and Cellular Changes after Transarterial Chemoembolization as Detected with MR ImagingRadiology, 2009
- Characterization of focal liver lesions by ADC measurements using a respiratory triggered diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar MR imaging techniqueEuropean Radiology, 2007
- Improved focal liver lesion detection: comparison of single-shot diffusion-weighted echoplanar and single-shotT2weighted turbo spin echo techniquesThe British Journal of Radiology, 2007
- Evaluation of Liver Diffusion Isotropy and Characterization of Focal Hepatic Lesions with Two Single-Shot Echo-planar MR Imaging Sequences: Prospective Study in 66 PatientsRadiology, 2003