Motion Path of the Instant Center of Rotation in the Cervical Spine During In Vivo Dynamic Flexion-Extension
- 1 May 2013
- journal article
- cervical spine
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Spine
- Vol. 38 (10), E594-E601
- https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31828ca5c7
Abstract
Study Design. Case-control. Objective. To characterize the motion path of the instant center of rotation (ICR) at each cervical motion segment from C2 to C7 during dynamic flexion-extension in asymptomatic subjects. To compare ICR paths in asymptomatic subjects and patients with single-level arthrodesis. Summary of Background Data. The ICR has been proposed as an alternative to range of motion (ROM) for evaluating the quality of spine movement and for identifying abnormal midrange kinematics. The motion path of the ICR during dynamic motion has not been reported. Methods. Twenty asymptomatic controls, 12 C5–C6, and 5 C6–C7 patients with arthrodesis performed full ROM flexion-extension, while biplane radiographs were obtained at 30 Hz. A previously validated tracking process determined 3-dimensional vertebral position with submillimeter accuracy. The finite helical axis method was used to calculate the ICR between adjacent vertebrae. A linear mixed-model analysis identified differences in the ICR path among motion segments and between controls and patients with arthrodesis. Results. From C2–C3 to C6–C7, the mean ICR location moved superior for each successive motion segment (P < 0.001). The anterior-posterior change in ICR location per degree of flexion-extension decreased from the C2–C3 motion segment to the C6–C7 motion segment (P < 0.001). Asymptomatic subject variability (95% confidence interval) in the ICR location averaged ± 1.2 mm in the superior-inferior direction and ± 1.9 mm in the anterior-posterior direction over all motion segments and flexion-extension angles. Asymptomatic and arthrodesis groups were not significantly different in terms of average ICR position (all P ≥ 0.091) or in terms of the change in ICR location per degree of flexion-extension (all P ≥ 0.249). Conclusion. To replicate asymptomatic in vivo cervical motion, disc replacements should account for level-specific differences in the location and motion path of ICR. Single-level anterior arthrodesis does not seem to affect cervical motion quality during flexion-extension. Level of Evidence: 4Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sagittal alignment and kinematics at instrumented and adjacent levels after total disc replacement in the cervical spineEuropean Spine Journal, 2012
- Validation of a Noninvasive Technique to Precisely Measure In Vivo Three-Dimensional Cervical Spine MovementSpine, 2011
- Exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation from Medical Imaging ProceduresThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Task-Specific Frequencies of Neck Motion Measured in Healthy Young Adults Over a Five-Day PeriodSpine, 2009
- Validation of three-dimensional model-based tibio-femoral tracking during runningMedical Engineering & Physics, 2009
- The quantitative measurements of the intervertebral angulation and translation during cervical flexion and extensionEuropean Spine Journal, 2007
- Validation of a New Model-Based Tracking Technique for Measuring Three-Dimensional, In Vivo Glenohumeral Joint KinematicsJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2006
- GPOWER: A general power analysis programBehavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 1996
- Instantaneous helical axis estimation from 3-D video data in neck kinematics for whiplash diagnosticsJournal of Biomechanics, 1994
- Errors in the Center and Angle of Rotation of a Joint: An Experimental StudyJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1982