An evaluation of hemoglobin measurement tools and their accuracy and reliability when screening for child anemia in Rwanda: A randomized study
Open Access
- 4 January 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 13 (1), e0187663
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187663
Abstract
Blood hemoglobin (Hb) is a common indicator for diagnosing anemia and is often determined through laboratory analysis of venous samples. One alternative to laboratory-based methods is the handheld HemoCue® Hb 201+ device, which requires a finger prick and wicking of blood into a pretreated cuvette for analysis. An alternative HemoCue® gravity method is being investigated for improved accuracy. Further, recent developments in noninvasive technologies could provide an accurate, rapid, safe, point-of-care option for hemoglobin estimation while addressing some limitations of current tools, but device performance must be assessed in low-resource settings. This study evaluated the performance of two HemoCue® Hb 201+ blood sampling methods and a noninvasive device (Pronto® with DCI-mini™ sensors) in a Rwandan pediatric clinic. Reference hemoglobin values were determined in 132 children 6 to 59 months of age by using a standard hematology analyzer (Sysmex KN21TM). Half were tested using the HemoCue® wicking method; half were tested using the HemoCue® gravity method; and 112 had successful hemoglobin readings with Pronto® DCI-mini™. Statistical analysis was used to assess the level of bias generated by each method and the key drivers of bias. The HemoCue® gravity method was the least biased. The HemoCue® wicking and Pronto® methods biases were inversely related to the Sysmex KN21TM results. Both HemoCue® sampling methods correctly classified patients’ anemic status in 80% or more of instances, whereas the Pronto® device had a correct classification rate of only 69%. The HemoCue® gravity method was more accurate than the traditional HemoCue® wicking method in this study, but its accuracy and operational feasibility should be confirmed by future studies. The Pronto® DCI-mini™ devices showed considerable promise but require further improvements in sensitivity and specificity before wider adoption.Funding Information
- United States Agency for International Development (AID-OAA-A-11-00051)
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity of non-invasive point-of-care hemoglobin estimation in healthy and sick children—a method comparison studyEuropean Journal of Pediatrics, 2015
- A noninvasive hemoglobin monitor in the pediatric intensive care unitJournal of Surgical Research, 2015
- A systematic analysis of global anemia burden from 1990 to 2010Blood, 2014
- Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countriesThe Lancet, 2013
- Capillary versus venous haemoglobin determination in the assessment of healthy blood donorsVox Sanguinis, 2013
- Haematological response to haem iron or ferrous sulphate mixed with refried black beans in moderately anaemic Guatemalan pre-school childrenPublic Health Nutrition, 2005
- Comparison between the HemoCue® and an automated counter for measuring hemoglobinRevista de Saúde Pública, 2004
- Validation of hemoglobin estimation using hemocueIndian Journal of Pediatrics, 2003
- Micronutrient and iron supplementation and effective antimalarial treatment synergistically improve childhood anaemiaTropical Medicine & International Health, 2000
- Precision, accuracy, and reliability of hemoglobin assessment with use of capillary bloodThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1999