Use of benchmarking and public reporting for infection control in four high-income countries
- 30 June 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Lancet Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 11 (6), 471-481
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70315-7
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 76 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reducing ventilator-associated pneumonia: When process control allows outcome improvement and even benchmarking*Critical Care Medicine, 2010
- The “Zero Risk” Concept for Hospital‐Acquired Infections: A Risky Business!Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2009
- “Never Events”: Not Every Hospital‐Acquired Infection Is PreventableClinical Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Reducing surgical site infection incidence through a network: results from the French ISO-RAISIN surveillance systemJournal of Hospital Infection, 2009
- A Qualitative Study of Consumers’ Views on Public Reporting of Health Care–Associated InfectionsAmerican Journal of Medical Quality, 2009
- Influence of infection control report cards on patients' choice of hospital: pilot surveyJournal of Hospital Infection, 2009
- Surveillance nosokomialer Infektionen bei Frühgeborenen (< 1500 g Geburtsgewicht) in NEO-KISS: Von der Freiwilligkeit zur VerpflichtungZeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie, 2008
- Mandatory Reporting and Pay for Performance: Health Care Infections in the LimelightAORN Journal, 2008
- Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practiceBMJ, 2007
- Reducing dialysis associated bacteraemia, and recommendations for surveillance in the United Kingdom: prospective studyBMJ, 2006