Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis
Open Access
- 1 January 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by The Korean Society of Radiology in Korean Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 16 (6), 1188-1196
- https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1188
Abstract
Lee J, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;16(6):1188-1196. http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1188Keywords
Funding Information
- Korea Health Industry Development Institute
- Ministry of Health and Welfare (HI14C1090)
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chapter 8: Meta-analysis of Test Performance When There is a “Gold Standard”Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2012
- Diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis: review of an important tool in radiological research and decision makingThe British Journal of Radiology, 2009
- Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test AccuracyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2008
- An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessaryJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test dataStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy from Multiple Conflicting ReportsMedical Decision Making, 1993
- Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerationsStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986