An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary
- 30 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 61 (11), 1095-1103
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.09.013
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Studies reporting ROC curves of diagnostic and prediction data can be incorporated into meta-analyses using corresponding odds ratiosJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2007
- Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic TechnologiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2005
- Evidence based diagnosticsBMJ, 2005
- Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic AccuracyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Meta‐analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Assessment Studies with Varying Number of ThresholdsBiometrics, 2003
- Systematic reviews with individual patient data meta-analysis to evaluate diagnostic testsEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2003
- Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD InitiativeAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelinesBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2002
- Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening testsBMJ, 2001
- Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995