Does the incidence of sore throat postoperatively increase with the use of a traditional intubation blade or the GlideScope?
- 1 December 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
- Vol. 27 (8), 646-651
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.06.005
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Force and pressure distribution using Macintosh and GlideScope laryngoscopes in normal and difficult airways: a manikin studyBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2011
- Routine Clinical Practice Effectiveness of the Glidescope in Difficult Airway ManagementAnesthesiology, 2011
- Comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: Pentax Airway Scope, C‐MAC™, Glidescope® vs the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation*Anaesthesia, 2010
- Is GlideScope® the Best Way to Intubate?Anesthesiology, 2010
- A Comparison of GlideScope® Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal IntubationAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2008
- Complaints of sore throat after tracheal intubationEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2005
- Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope®) in 728 patientsCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2005
- Postoperative sore throat after ambulatory surgeryBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002
- Power and sample size calculations: A review and computer programControlled Clinical Trials, 1990