Unsedated ultrathin EGD by using a 5.2-mm–diameter videoscope: evaluation of acceptability and diagnostic accuracy
Open Access
- 31 December 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 64 (6), 868-873
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.01.025
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ulcers and GastritisEndoscopy, 2005
- Discrimination of Normal Gastric Mucosa from Helicobacter pylori Gastritis using Standard Endoscopes and a Single Observation Site: Studies in Children and Young AdultsHelicobacter, 2004
- Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated EGD: a multicenter randomized trialGastroenterology, 2003
- Characteristic endoscopic and magnified endoscopic findings in the normal stomach without Helicobacter pylori infectionJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2002
- A Prospective Controlled Trial of an Ultrathin Versus a Conventional Endoscope in Unsedated Upper Gastrointestinal EndoscopyEndoscopy, 2001
- IntroductionGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1999
- Unsedated small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus conventional EGD: A comparative studyGastroenterology, 1999
- Prospective evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: feasibility and study on performance and toleranceGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1999
- Unsedated Peroral Endoscopy With a Video Ultrathin Endoscope: Patient Acceptance, Tolerance, and Diagnostic AccuracyThe American Journal of Gastroenterology, 1998
- A comparative study of unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and conventional EGDGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1996