The effect of the electronic transmission of prescriptions on dispensing errors and prescription enhancements made in English community pharmacies: a naturalistic stepped wedge study
Open Access
- 17 April 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Quality & Safety
- Vol. 23 (8), 629-638
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002776
Abstract
Objectives To compare prevalence and types of dispensing errors and pharmacists’ labelling enhancements, for prescriptions transmitted electronically versus paper prescriptions. Design Naturalistic stepped wedge study. Setting 15 English community pharmacies. Intervention Electronic transmission of prescriptions between prescriber and pharmacy. Main outcome measures Prevalence of labelling errors, content errors and labelling enhancements (beneficial additions to the instructions), as identified by researchers visiting each pharmacy. Results Overall, we identified labelling errors in 5.4% of 16 357 dispensed items, and content errors in 1.4%; enhancements were made for 13.6%. Pharmacists also edited the label for a further 21.9% of electronically transmitted items. Electronically transmitted prescriptions had a higher prevalence of labelling errors (7.4% of 3733 items) than other prescriptions (4.8% of 12 624); OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.76). There was no difference for content errors or enhancements. The increase in labelling errors was mainly accounted for by errors (mainly at one pharmacy) involving omission of the indication, where specified by the prescriber, from the label. A sensitivity analysis in which these cases (n=158) were not considered errors revealed no remaining difference between prescription types. Conclusions We identified a higher prevalence of labelling errors for items transmitted electronically, but this was predominantly accounted for by local practice in a single pharmacy, independent of prescription type. Community pharmacists made labelling enhancements to about one in seven dispensed items, whether electronically transmitted or not. Community pharmacists, prescribers, professional bodies and software providers should work together to agree how items should be dispensed and labelled to best reap the benefits of electronically transmitted prescriptions. Community pharmacists need to ensure their computer systems are promptly updated to help reduce errors.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- English community pharmacists’ experiences of using electronic transmission of prescriptions: a qualitative studyBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- The prevalence and nature of prescribing and monitoring errors in English general practice: a retrospective case note reviewBritish Journal of General Practice, 2013
- Transmitting and processing electronic prescriptions: experiences of physician practices and pharmaciesJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2011
- Addition of electronic prescription transmission to computerized prescriber order entry: Effect on dispensing errors in community pharmaciesAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 2011
- An unintended consequence of electronic prescriptions: prevalence and impact of internal discrepanciesJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2010
- Electronic Prescribing Improves Medication Safety in Community-Based Office PracticesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2010
- Care homes' use of medicines study: prevalence, causes and potential harm of medication errors in care homes for older peopleQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2009
- Dispensing errors in community pharmacy: frequency, clinical significance and potential impact of authentication at the point of dispensingInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 2007
- The relevance of practice research to policyInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 2007
- Prospective study of the incidence, nature and causes of dispensing errors in community pharmaciesPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2005