The prevalence and nature of prescribing and monitoring errors in English general practice: a retrospective case note review
Open Access
- 1 August 2013
- journal article
- Published by Royal College of General Practitioners in British Journal of General Practice
- Vol. 63 (613), e543-e553
- https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13x670679
Abstract
Background Relatively little is known about prescribing errors in general practice, or the factors associated with error. Aim To determine the prevalence and nature of prescribing and monitoring errors in general practices in England. Design and setting Retrospective case-note review of unique medication items prescribed over a 12-month period to a 2% random sample of patients. Fifteen general practices across three primary care trusts in England. Method A total of 6048 unique prescription items prescribed over the previous 12 months for 1777 patients were examined. The data were analysed by mixed effects logistic regression. The main outcome measures were prevalence of prescribing and monitoring errors, and severity of errors, using validated definitions. Results Prescribing and/or monitoring errors were detected in 4.9% (296/6048) of all prescription items (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.4% to 5.5%). The vast majority of errors were of mild to moderate severity, with 0.2% (11/6048) of items having a severe error. After adjusting for covariates, patient-related factors associated with an increased risk of prescribing and/or monitoring errors were: age 64 years (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.04 to 2.73, P = 0.035), and higher numbers of unique medication items prescribed (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.19, P<0.001). Conclusion Prescribing and monitoring errors are common in English general practice, although severe errors are unusual. Many factors increase the risk of error. Having identified the most common and important errors, and the factors associated with these, strategies to prevent future errors should be developed, based on the study findings.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- A review of human factors principles for the design and implementation of medication safety alerts in clinical information systemsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2010
- Care homes' use of medicines study: prevalence, causes and potential harm of medication errors in care homes for older peopleQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2009
- What Evidence Supports the Use of Computerized Alerts and Prompts to Improve Clinicians' Prescribing Behavior?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2009
- Protocol for the PINCER trial: a cluster randomised trial comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management in general practicesTrials, 2009
- Prevalence, Incidence and Nature of Prescribing Errors in Hospital InpatientsDrug Safety, 2009
- Development and validation of criteria to identify medication-monitoring errors in care home residentsInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 2008
- Which drugs cause preventable admissions to hospital? A systematic reviewBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2006
- Medication errors: a baseline survey of interventions recorded during the dispensing process in community pharmaciesInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 2002
- What is a prescribing error?Quality in health care : QHC, 2000
- Prescription errors detected by Swedish pharmacistsInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 1995