Developing a Simplified Consent Form for Biobanking
Open Access
- 8 October 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 5 (10), e13302
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013302
Abstract
Consent forms have lengthened over time and become harder for participants to understand. We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of creating a simplified consent form for biobanking that comprises the minimum information necessary to meet ethical and regulatory requirements. We then gathered preliminary data concerning its content from hypothetical biobank participants. We followed basic principles of plain-language writing and incorporated into a 2-page form (not including the signature page) those elements of information required by federal regulations and recommended by best practice guidelines for biobanking. We then recruited diabetes patients from community-based practices and randomized half (n = 56) to read the 2-page form, first on paper and then a second time on a tablet computer. Participants were encouraged to use “More information” buttons on the electronic version whenever they had questions or desired further information. These buttons led to a series of “Frequently Asked Questions” (FAQs) that contained additional detailed information. Participants were asked to identify specific sentences in the FAQs they thought would be important if they were considering taking part in a biorepository. On average, participants identified 7 FAQ sentences as important (mean 6.6, SD 14.7, range: 0–71). No one sentence was highlighted by a majority of participants; further, 34 (60.7%) participants did not highlight any FAQ sentences. Our preliminary findings suggest that our 2-page form contains the information that most prospective participants identify as important. Combining simplified forms with supplemental material for those participants who desire more information could help minimize consent form length and complexity, allowing the most substantively material information to be better highlighted and enabling potential participants to read the form and ask questions more effectively.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simplifying informed consent for biorepositories: Stakeholder perspectivesGenetics in Medicine, 2010
- Offering Individual Genetic Research Results: Context MattersScience Translational Medicine, 2010
- Certificates of Confidentiality and Compelled Disclosure of DataScience, 2008
- Knowledge and understanding among cancer patients consenting to participate in clinical trialsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2008
- Informed Consent for Biorepositories: Assessing Prospective Participants' Understanding and OpinionsCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2008
- Longer Consent Forms for Clinical Trials Compromise Patient Understanding: So Why Are They Lengthening?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Reporting genetic results in research studies: Summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working groupAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2006
- Readability Standards for Informed-Consent Forms as Compared with Actual ReadabilityNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional surveyThe Lancet, 2001
- Informed Consent for Medical Research: Common Discrepancies and ReadabilityAcademic Emergency Medicine, 1996