Assessing the Effect on Outcomes of Public or Private Provision of Prenatal Care in Portugal
- 31 January 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Maternal and Child Health Journal
- Vol. 19 (7), 1574-1583
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1667-4
Abstract
To evaluate whether public and private prenatal care users experience similar outcomes, taking into consideration maternal pre-pregnancy social and clinical risk. We studied 7,325 women who delivered single newborns at five public maternity units in Porto, Portugal. Health behaviors and prenatal care were self-reported; pregnancy complications and delivery data were retrieved from medical files. The odds of inadequate weight gain, continuing to smoke, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, caesarean section, preterm birth, low birthweight, and small- and large-for-gestational-age were estimated for public and private providers using logistic regression, stratified by pre-pregnancy risk profile, adjusted for maternal characteristics. 38 % of women used private prenatal care. Among low-risk women, public care users were more likely to gain excessive weight (OR 1.26; 95 % CI 1.06–1.57) and be diagnosed with gestational diabetes (OR 1.37; 95 % CI 1.01–1.86). They were less likely to have a caesarean (OR 0.63; 95 % CI 0.51–0.78) and more likely to deliver small-for-gestational-age babies (OR 1.48; 95 % CI 1.19–1.83). Outcomes were similar in high-risk women although preterm and pre-labor caesarean were less frequent in public care users (OR 0.64 95 % CI 0.45–0.91; OR 0.69 95 % CI 0.49–0.97). The amount of care was not significantly related to risk profile in either case. Public care users experienced similar outcomes to those using private care, despite higher pre-pregnancy disadvantage. Low-risk women need further attention if narrowing inequalities in birth outcomes remains a priority.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pregnancy and Birth Cohort Resources in Europe: a Large Opportunity for Aetiological Child Health ResearchPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2013
- The Brazilian Preference: Cesarean Delivery among Immigrants in PortugalPLOS ONE, 2013
- Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trialBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2012
- Inequalities in utilisation of general practitioner and specialist services in 9 European countriesBMC Health Services Research, 2011
- Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (1 of 7): definitions, description of the burden and opportunities to improve dataBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2010
- New guidelines for weight gain during pregnancy: what obstetrician/gynecologists should knowCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009
- The impact of the First Steps prenatal care program on birth outcomes among women receiving Medicaid in Washington StateHealth Policy, 2009
- Models of antenatal care and obstetric outcomes in Sydney South WestAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2008
- Public and private prenatal care providers in urban Mexico: how does their quality compare?International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2006
- WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal careThe Lancet, 2001