Public and private prenatal care providers in urban Mexico: how does their quality compare?
Open Access
- 4 May 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal for Quality in Health Care
- Vol. 18 (4), 306-313
- https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzl012
Abstract
Objective. To evaluate variations in prenatal care quality by public and private clinical settings and by household wealth. Design. The study uses 2003 data detailing retrospective reports of 12 prenatal care procedures received that correspond to clinical guidelines. The 12 procedures are summed up, and prenatal care quality is described as the average procedures received by clinical setting, provider qualifications, and household wealth. Setting. Low-income communities in 17 states in urban Mexico. Participants. A total of 1253 women of reproductive age who received prenatal care within 1 year of the survey. Main outcome measure. The mean of the 12 prenatal care procedures received, reported as unadjusted and adjusted for individual, household, and community characteristics. Results. Women received significantly more procedures in public clinical settings [80.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 79.3–82.1; P ≤ 0.05] compared with private (60.2, 95% CI = 57.8–62.7; P ≤ 0.05). Within private clinical settings, an increase in household wealth is associated with an increase in procedures received. Care from medical doctors is associated with significantly more procedures (78.8, 95% CI = 77.5–80.1; P ≤ 0.05) compared with non-medical doctors (50.3, 95% CI = 46.7–53.9; P ≤ 0.05). These differences are independent of individual, household, and community characteristics that affect health-seeking behavior. Conclusions. Significant differences in prenatal care quality exist across clinical settings, provider qualifications, and household wealth in urban Mexico. Strategies to improve quality include quality reporting, training, accreditation, regulation, and franchising.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Information and consumer choice: The value of publicized health plan ratingsJournal of Health Economics, 2006
- Economic impact of antiretroviral therapy prescription decisions in the context of rapid scaling-up of access to treatment: lessons from MexicoAIDS, 2006
- Factors associated with the utilization and content of prenatal care in a western urban district of TurkeyInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2005
- Comparative quality of private and public health services in rural VietnamHealth Policy and Planning, 2005
- The importance of quality of care in perinatal mortality: a case-control study in Chiapas, MexicoArchives of Medical Research, 2004
- Strategies for engaging the private sector in sexual and reproductive health: how effective are they?Health Policy and Planning, 2004
- STD trends and patterns of treatment for STD by physicians in private practice in PeruSexually Transmitted Infections, 2003
- Research report. The quality of private and public primary health care management of children with diarrhoea and acute respiratory infections in Tlaxcala, MexicoHealth Policy and Planning, 1998
- Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed careThe Lancet, 1996
- The Effectiveness of Antenatal Care in Preventing Intrauterine Growth Retardation and Low Birth Weight Due to Preterm DeliveryInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1996